|
Preaching the Word of God is a key element of the church.
However, while its importance is often underrated, the life-changing power
of some preaching styles is often overrated: Knowledge alone does not
change lives (even with some preachers believing so). Research can help us
understand more about the life-changing aspects of sermons, and how to
improve our preaching styles accordingly.
We recently did some research into how
sermons influence some areas of a local church's health from the data
provided by our worldwide database (data from more than 33,000 churches in
more than 50 countries). In this article we check how the quality of
sermons relates to other aspects of inspiring worship, to evangelistic
effectiveness, and to passionate spirituality. We draw our conclusions
from comparisons and correlation tests. Although our summaries are based
on statistics, we will try to convey the findings in a user-friendly way
for non-statisticians.
A sermon is a very important means of
communication with God's people. Prophets preached, Jesus preached, the
disciples preached. Preaching was a part of early church life (Acts 5:42;
10:42; 14:15; 15:21; 16:6, 10; 17:3, etc.) How much is it an agent of
corporate change today? Does the sermon bring new spiritual life? Does it
ignite a new faith excitement? Does it sparkle with a new enthusiasm for
winning people to Christ?
One sermon is not like another, and one
preacher is not like another. There are some preachers of the world (some
deceased, Billy Graham and others) who have had an extraordinary gift of
communicating God's Word. When they preached, they touched the hearts of
many people. The NCD database indicates, however, that you do not have to
be Bill Hybels or Chuck Swindoll to give a life-changing sermon.
Not much Boredom in Worship Services
The good news first: World-wide, Christians
like in general the sermons of their pastors. They enjoy listening to
them, and they rarely experience boredom during the worship service: There
are only 5 percent of those regularly attending worship who hardly or
never enjoy sermons, and 19 percent of those who enjoy sermons to an
average extent, but there are 39 percent who enjoy sermons to a great
extent and 37 of those who enjoy sermons to a very great extent (see
diagram 1). There are about 7 percent of those who are often bored in the
worship service, 16 percent sometimes bored, 37 hardly, 40 never bored
(see diagram 2).


Another aspect of sermons is how they
address human needs. One of the NCD survey's question is: I feel that the
sermon in the worship service speaks to my personal situation. Only 8
percent of people worldwide do not consider sermons relevant to their
personal life, 25 percent agree to an average extent, and the huge
majority of 67 percent agree to a great or very great extent (diagram 3).

In other words: There is not too much
criticism from church members regarding the message of their pastors. But
what about the effects that sermons have? Do sermons make a difference to
the growth and the quality of the church? And if so, what kind of sermons?
The Impact of Need-Orientated Sermons
There are many aspects of church health. One of these interconnected
ingredients of health is the sermon. Our database confirms that churches
where people enjoy listening to sermons and where sermons speak to their
personal situation are healthier. All the eight quality characteristics of
NCD (empowering leadership, gift-oriented ministry, passionate
spirituality, functional structures, inspiring worship services, holistic
small groups, need-orientated evangelism, loving relationships) show a
difference in health in relationship with the quality of sermons (diagrams
4 & 5).


How to read these diagrams: An average church has a value of 50
in each of the 8 quality characteristics. The diagrams show that in
churches with a high quality in the area of "Inspiring Worship Service" or
even in all 8 quality characteristics (60 or higher), a huge majority of
visitors agree that "the sermon speaks to my personal situation", or "I
enjoy listening to the sermons". Low quality churches (40 or less) have
sermons where people do not like to listen or do not have the feeling that
their personal needs have been addressed.
This is not to say that it is the sermon
that most improves your church's health but the sermon can make a
difference. The closest connection between the quality of church life and
the sermon is obviously seen in inspiring worship. The following table
shows how the sermon correlates to other aspects of worship. There are two
fairly strong relationships:
-
The relationship between "I enjoy listening to the sermons" and
"worship is an inspiring experience for me";
-
The relationship between "the sermon speaks to my personal
situation" and "the church service has a positive influence on me."
The first relationship describes the momentary experience of the
worship, to the uplifting of the soul. The other relationship points more
towards the outcome of inspiring worship that is towards a change in
life that is brought about by listening to sermons and participating in
church services. We can say that a good quality sermon greatly contributes
both to the spiritual feast of the worshippers and to the impulse for
change in their lives.
| Note:
All comparisons are correlated with high significance (p=0,000)
Attending the worship service |
is an
inspiring experience for
me. I feel that the church service |
has a
positive influence on me. |
I'm
often bored in the worship service. |
I enjoy
listening to the
sermons in the worship service. |
0,623
|
0,583 |
-0,481 |
| I feel
that the sermon in the worship service speaks to my personal
situation. |
0,585
|
0,623
|
-0,485 |
How to read this table: The relationship between questions is
calculated as a correlation coefficient. With a value between +1 and 1,
the coefficient expresses which direction this relationship has (positive
or negative) and how strong it is. The greater the number of church
members who either agree or disagree at the same time with two statements,
the more the coefficient approaches the value of +1. If most members
characterise the sermons as irrelevant to their lives while finding the
worship service inspiring, the coefficient will approach a value of 1. A
correlation coefficient of zero or near zero means that there is no
systematic relationship between the two items concerned. A correlation
coefficient should be greater than 0.4 (or below -0.4).
One Third More Service Attendance with Need-Orientated Sermons
There may have been times when people came to church regardless of the
quality of worship and sermon, but today it is not true anymore. The
quality and relevance of your sermon can make a difference of 33-38% in
the size of your church attendance. It means that if there are 100 people
attending worship who do not enjoy listening to the sermon, you would be
likely to have 150 in worship attendance if your sermon were enjoyable. Or
if there are 200 church goers who do not consider your sermon is relevant,
there would be as many as 120 people more in your church pews if your
sermon were to speak to their personal situation.
Size of attendance
based on agreement with the following questions |
Q26: I
enjoy listening to the sermons in the worship service. |
Q45: I
feel that the sermon in the worship service speaks to my personal
situation. |
| Agree to a very great extent |
251
people |
265
people |
| agree to a great extent |
213
people |
222
people |
| agree to an average extent |
187
people |
185
people |
| hardly |
177
people |
175
people |
| not at all |
169
people |
164
people |
However, this may not be the only reason for the size of attendance,
because the relationship between the quality of the sermons and the
attraction of the church services to outsiders is weak (correlation:
0.14). Yet, about a third of believers prefer to bring outsiders to the
church when they know they are going to listen to great sermons. So as
much as the sermon is not "the only" key for the health of your church, it
should not be considered as the primary and/or major evangelistic tool.
Effective evangelism is a process that consists of many and varied
elements, of which the sermon is one.
And Now the Bad News
The last comparison follows the relationship between the quality of
sermons and questions describing one's spiritual life. Most of the
correlations in the following table are weak. We have to admit that good
sermons do not automatically change lives. Their impact is somewhat
limited. As stated earlier, the sermon is just a part of the package for
change in people's lives. More than preaching is needed.
Note:
All comparisons are correlated with high significance (p=0,000)
|
I enjoy
reading the Bible on my
own |
I
experience the transforming influences faith has in the different
areas
of my life (e.g. job, family, leisure time
etc.). |
The Word
of God is the most important authority in the decisions of my
everyday life. |
Very
often I have reason to thank God for his work in my life.
|
| I enjoy
listening to the sermons in the worship service. |
0,229
|
0,239
|
0,210
|
0,269 |
| I feel
that the sermon in the worship service speaks to my personal
situation. |
0,188
|
0,262
|
0,234
|
0,300 |
Conclusion: While need-orientated sermons accompany an overall high
quality church more church growth, and a higher motivation of members to
invite new people their direct impact on changing lives is pretty
limited. It seems that sermons play an important role as a puzzle piece in
the overall church life, but changing the behaviour of people and leading
them to a life as followers of Christ also needs elements like training,
discipleship, and so on.
Petr Činčala (PhD) lives in the Czech
Republic and works as Research Manager for NCD International |
|