|
What role does a "mission statement" play in the life of a
church? You can illustrate and explain this question through the image of
a "vision tree".
The "mission statement" of a church – like the stem of a tree – bears all
the ministries and events (branches and leaves). At the same time, it
channels and focuses all the energy in a way that leads the church to do
the things that correspond with God's will for this church and produce
fruit.
The "mission statement" itself is rooted in core values (roots)
and biblical principles (ground). Don't miss the picture of the swing in
the Vision Tree, it draws attention to the fact that church ministry which
is in line with God's calling will be fun as well.

("Vision Tree" according to Logan & Ogne)
How do I recognize God's calling for my church?
A good number of books are available already
addressing the question of recognizing God's calling for one's own life,
one's ministry, or one's church. Most of them, however, draw on the
picture of the lonesome leader who is engaging God all by himself for a
vision of the future. The key issue afterwards, of course, will be the
communication of this vision to co-workers and church members. And often
it is this very issue of communication that makes the implementation of
the vision fail. That should not come as a surprise. After all, nobody
likes to be pushed around by someone else's vision.
If the discovery of God's calling for the church is not to turn into
another bag of tricks, a different approach needs to be chosen.
Recognizing the will of God, then, must not be left to the church leaders
alone. In fact, the title of this paragraph should be changed to How do
we – together – recognize God's calling for our church? That's the
only way to make sure that God's calling (and the comprehension thereof)
does not turn into an enormous burden for a single person, but makes
(church-)life easier for every church member.
Of course, it does not hurt if the church leaders (along with other
co-workers and church members) prepare themselves for this overall
discovery process by asking God for guidance and reflecting on some key
issues:
1. Ask God to show you his calling for your church
In James 4:2 we read, "You do not have,
because you do not ask God." When I point out in seminars how important it
is to recognize God's calling, I often hear the question, "How, in fact,
do I do that?" It seems that some rather abstruse ideas exist in the minds
of many Christians, because most of them are really surprised when I
respond with another question, "Did you ever ask God to show you his
calling?"
Some years ago I discovered a checklist for
recognizing God's calling. The first item is simply stated, "I have been
praying for at least 10 hours." Prayer in fact is the key when we want to
recognize God's calling – no matter if this applies to our personal lives
or to our churches: Prayers – on your own or together with others – and in
particular prayers that draw on our knowledge of the situation, of people
we want to reach, our values, our calling, and our dreams. In our prayers
we lift those things to God and at the same time listen to what he has to
say about it. I call this "reflective prayer". As I direct a beam of light
on to a mirror and see it reflected back, I direct my thoughts to God who
will reflect them back – now, however, with his handwriting.
2. Have a close look at your environment
When I say that in our prayers to God we
should employ our knowledge of the situation and our target group, I
presuppose that we have done some investigation. We need to allow the
needs of the people around us to touch us. This might open up a door for a
personal encounter with God.
In Matthew 9:36-38 Jesus is touched by the needs of the people
around him. "When he saw the crowds, he had compassion on them, because
they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd. Then he
said to his disciples, 'The harvest is plentiful but the workers are few.
Ask the Lord of the harvest, therefore, to send out workers into his
harvest field.'"
Taking a closer look at your setting can be done in a variety of
systematic ways: Maybe God will touch your heart as you walk through
shopping malls and plazas and watch the people around you. In your
situation, it may even make sense to do some demographic research on the
age structure of the residents in your city, on their specific needs, on
their income, the average number of children, their life style, and so on.
3. Draw up your personal "mission statement"
Drawing up your personal "mission statement"
(see part two) will be an ideal starting-point for participating in the
joint process of recognizing God's calling for your local church. Why?
Because the church is the body of Christ and every single member of this
body is important. Your own personal calling will be an integral part of
God's calling for your church. So before you start exploring God's calling
for your church, it would be good for you (and as many members of your
church as possible) to draw up your personal "mission statement" first.
Maybe it would be best if as many small groups in your church as possible
would work through this book at the beginning of this process.
|
Exercise: Take a few minutes and write down what you
want to implement from the items above. |
The Future Search Conference: Dreaming
together of the future
What should our church – according to God's
plan – look like in ten years? Many leaders are afraid of this question.
"That is not possible for me to know!" – "I'm not a fortune teller, am I?"
But God "is able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine" (Eph
3:20). In fact, we cannot imagine what God has in mind to do. Would it not
be exciting to get at least some insight into God's plans? Would it not be
helpful, even indispensable, to see what God wants to do with our church?
God gave birth to the church because it plays such a strategic role in his
plan. Would he not be a poor "leader" if he did not brief us on our job?
And in fact, God likes giving us direction for our lives (Jam 1:5).
In my experience a so-called "Future Search Conference" can be
helpful for a church to explore its specific calling (Marvin Weisbord.
How Future Search Conferences Bring People Together to Achieve
Breakthrough Innovation, Empowerment, Shared Vision and Collaborative
Action. Berrett Koehler Publishing). In such a conference a relatively
large group of church members, representing all the formal and informal
groups of the church you can think of, come together. They are guided by a
moderator to discover their common future and God's calling. This process
will not only generate a greater understanding of the shared values and a
vision for the church but will also reduce the prejudices between various
groups and develop appreciation for one another.
Why Future Search Conferences are working?
1. The "whole church" will be together in
one room
For small churches, this might literally be
the case – every church member is meeting in one room. In larger churches
a cross-section of all the groups, boards, teams and maybe even of the
church's neighbourhood will be chosen. The questions needed for the
selection of church members are: Whose support is needed? Who represents a
larger group? Who would like to participate? Participants not only
contribute to the process with their God-given potential (spiritual gifts,
insights into the will of God…) but also increase through their own
involvement the chance of implementing the vision for their personal
lives.
2. You work on that which is common and not on conflict
In many churches conflict impedes effective
church development. In others it is the lack of orientation and the fact
that everybody works on his or her own. In the course of a Future Search
Conference it will become clear what all the church members have in
common. You concentrate on what is shared, not on what separates the
individuals from one another. This does not mean, however, that
disagreements and conflicts are ignored. It is just that they are set
aside for the time being.
3. First you reach consent, then you work on an action plan
Premature action is avoided. In this way,
participants are prevented from getting lost in too many details. All
things remain relatively open. It is only on the third day that the group
decides on what to write down for implementation and who needs to do what
by what date. Before that the focus is really on collecting and
interpreting perceptions and information.
What does the program of a Future Search
Conference look like?
32 to 64 persons, building up to eight
groups of eight persons each, gather in one room for about 15 hours,
within the course of three days. For example, Friday afternoon, all day
Saturday, and maybe a few hours on Sunday after the church service. The
members spend this time working partly in mixed groups, partly in interest
groups, partly on their own, or in plenary sessions. They need to complete
five assignments: (1) Look back at their past, (2) Consider contextual
factors, (3) Look inside church, (4) Develop a vision for the future, and
(5) Draw up a "mission statement" for the church.
1. Look back at their past
The first task is a look back on key events,
just like the life line you developed as you worked on your personal
"mission statement": How long is it since the first small group in your
church started? What was the motivation of the elderly people when they
started their Sunday evening service? What was it like back then when the
church building was built? Who donated the money for this building?
Working in different groups, the participants will mark
highlights and milestones on three different time axes (one for society,
one for the church, and one for the personal history). Each group has 30
to 45 minutes for this assignment. They will interpret their findings and
present them to the plenary session. The plenary group will then reflect
on the meaning of those results for the future: "What does this mean for
us? Do we see any train of thoughts? This time can be very valuable if
people are asked beforehand to bring along things they attach to personal
memories: a church bulletin from the past, photos of the small group back
in 1965 or something like this.
2. Consider contextual factors
Tasks 2 directs the participants' attention
to trends and influences in the present: What are the present trends? What
are the problems and needs of the people around us? How many people are
unemployed? What is the divorce rate like? Where are the places where kids
can play after school? Who takes care of elderly people? Do we know our
target group at all? Maybe additional topics will come up at this point.
The key issue will always be to consider how those topics impact the
church and how the church deals with them. The participants are challenged
to share their observations of the church's environment. The shared image
that is developed at this point is much more complete than any individual
one. The consequences for the present and the future become clearer.
At this stage participants will be working in mixed groups where
everybody can share his or her point of view. Concrete examples can help
to explain trends more effectively. In the plenary session the trends
which have been recognized will be put together on a flipchart as a mind
map. After that, the participants weigh up the trends by attaching post-it
notes: The goal here is to build a basis for discussion, not to set
priorities. Then, the participants will split up into groups again – this
time in interest groups. The task is to analyze the consequences for the
church that emerge from the trends. Key questions are: What have we done
already in this area? What did God show us already? What do we need to do
now?
Each group has 45 minutes to reflect on
these questions. The presentation to the plenary session, which follows,
is not to exceed 4 minutes. This will close the first day.
3. Look inside church
The second day will begin with discussions
in interest groups: What are the developments and trends within the
church? What can we be proud of? What is working well in our church? It is
important here the groups do not have an improper kind modesty. There will
be many good things to be discovered. It would be good to express your
gratitude towards God in a time of joint prayer. Afterwards, the following
questions need to be addressed: "What do we regret? What are we not
pleased with?" The goal here is not to blame anybody but to discover where
we have put obstacles in the way ourselves. Now it should have become
clear what to take forward and what to leave behind. The participants will
begin to feel responsible for the weaknesses that begin to surface. The
groups have 45 minutes for reflection and discussion before the findings
will be presented and interpreted again in the plenary session: What do we
think about what we have just heard? What do we learn from that? What has
God shown us through the various challenges?
At this stage it is most helpful for a
church profile to have been completed already, describing the strengths
and weaknesses of the church on the basis of the quality characteristics
of healthy growing churches (C. A. Schwarz. Natural Church Development.
NCD Media). Likewise it would be very interesting if a gift inventory
were available, showing the distribution of spiritual gifts within the
church (Christoph Schalk & Jon Haley. The 3 Colors of Ministry: How to
Implement in Your Church. ChurchSmart Resources).
4. Develop a vision for the future
"We are living now in the year 2010. Today
belongs to the past. Have a look around: What do you see in our church
now? What values shape our church? What biblical principles are at the
centre? What ministries and programs have emerged? What have we achieved
in the last couple of years?" In this or a similar way the moderator will
introduce the next assignment. Various (mixed) groups are now to engage
the potential future of the church in creative ways. Through sketches,
collages, speeches, newspaper articles and other means the church is
presented as pictured in five to ten years. The participants experience
the future and get a real sense of what it will feel like. This increases
the likelihood of the necessary change taking place.
Each group should have at least two and a half hours for this
assignment. This phase of the process begins with a time of silence and
meditation, allowing each participant to reflect on what "vision of the
future" God has placed in their hearts. Helpful questions are: What makes
me really angry or sad? What makes me total excited? What would I
criticize in other churches (or in our church)?
The results of the work done in various
groups will be presented in plenary session and then analyzed for what
they have in common. This phase typically generates a high level of
motivation among group members to join efforts and create the envisioned
future together. Usually about 80 percent of the scenes portrayed by the
various groups will overlap in content. This overlap will be worked out in
various mixed groups in light of the following questions: What can our
common future look like? What values and biblical principles are to
determine the vision for our church? What are the differences?
After all groups have answered these
questions, two groups at a time join together and repeat the process. Then
you continue in the plenary session – again with the goal to discover what
the contributions have in common. The results will be visualized on a
flipchart. What should remain is only that which all the group members can
support. This may possibly require some time and energy, because some
differences will remain. Either you make a list of "unsolved differences"
and postpone solving those differences or you ask one representative from
each group where there is a disagreement to meet in another room and
struggle for a solution in prayer and discussion. The second day will
close again with a time of prayer.
5. Drawing up a mission statement for the
church
The third day begins with silence: Everybody
takes a close look at the notes on the flipchart and takes time for
reflection and prayer. Mixed groups will then work on a "mission
statement". All the "common ground" that has been explored and established
on the days before is to be reflected in the "mission statement." If
possible, it should be summarized in a brief statement. Eventually, each
group will present its version of the "mission statement" in the plenary
session. Often it is possible at this stage for the plenary to develop a
first draft of a mutual "mission statement". Careful phrasing is not
necessary now. This in fact can be done later on or be delegated to a
working group after the Future Search Conference.
Finally, the "mission statement" needs to be
checked in light of the following criteria: Does it clearly communicate
God's calling for this church? Has our target group been defined? Does it
state clearly the needs in our environment which we want to meet? Are
other ministries mentioned that are to help us implement what we are
called to do? Is the "mission statement" precise, concise, catchy and
motivating?
To avoid the risk of having produced a nice
piece of paper without any practical relevance, the various interest
groups are now asked to reflect on the first consequences of the "mission
statement" for their own ministries. What is the meaning of the "mission
statement" for the various interest groups? How does it need to be
"translated"? A specific action plan is necessary: Who does what by what
deadline? In this phase those individuals with a high energy level should
be discerned, i.e., people who have a strong interest in a specific issue
and therefore are highly motivated to invest whatever it takes to make
things happen.
At this point it is also necessary to think about any follow-up
needed: Are further meetings necessary? Do we need a working group? When
will we continue? Who is responsible for the follow-up needed? Make sure
you keep a record of all contributions and results so that nothing gets
lost.
|
Exercise: Familiarize yourself thoroughly with the
process of the Future Search Conference. Could this approach help
you recognize your calling as a church? Or do you already have a
"mission statement" for your church? If so, does it correspond to
the criteria mentioned above? Is it really accepted by the entire
church body? |
 |
This chapter was
taken and translated from Leichter leben lernen (The Keys to
a simpler and more fulfilling life) by Christoph Schalk. Leichter
leben lernen is available in German only from CoachNet D.A.CH.
Copyright 2003: Christoph Schalk, C&P Publishing, used by
permission. |
Christoph Schalk lives in Germany and directs the international
consultant network of the Institute for Natural Church Development. |