|
I have to confess that it is with some
hesitation that I share these things with the international NCD community.
I feel somewhat like Martin Luther in the sense that, in Canada, we have
questioned very accepted NCD norms. I know what you are thinking, Luther
never heard of NCD and that is true, but he went against the flow. We
embarked on a journey of hard questions in Canada...
... and the result was a left turn in our
strategy for NCD.
We began NCD in Canada in 1998 the way that
many did. We held training conferences to equip NCD coaches who would go
and work with Canadian churches. We taught them about NCD and about
coaching. They left our seminars with a dongle, a survey, two days of
training and accreditation as an NCD coach in Canada. We counted on them
to go forth and multiply and to some extent, some did a wonderful job. We
have coaches in Canada that passionately share the NCD gospel with
churches and denominational leaders and recruit churches to begin the NCD
process. We will be forever grateful to these.
In fact, we so enjoyed working with these
coaches, it took us a long time to ask ourselves how effective our
strategy really was. When we took the time to ask the questions, we did
not like the answers. The truth was that Canadian church leaders were
spending a lot of time and money to take our NCD training and most did not
go on to coach churches.
Unpleasant discoveries
As we began asking ourselves the hard
questions, we made unpleasant discoveries. We found that most leaders who
attended our training had not coached a single church other than their
own. In fact, in 2001, our coaches did an average of .5 surveys each. Take
note of the dot in front of the five. That is correct, less than one
survey per coach. With a long term goal of 3,000 surveys per year we would
need to train 6,000 coaches to accomplish the task. This was never going
to happen. We were already beginning to see declining numbers attending
our NCD training. There was something amiss in Canada.
Here is what we learned about our coaches.
Many were denominational leaders who took the coaches training to learn
about NCD, not to become coaches. Many more were senior pastors who simply
wanted to be equipped to work within their own church. A number of leaders
were simply too busy doing what they were already paid to do, solve
denominational conflicts, help with church plants, attend meetings,
preach, etc. NCD was far down their priority list and few, very few, were
held accountable by anyone for their progress with NCD. To compound the
problem, the people who did have the time and energy to work with churches
found it very difficult to make a living as an NCD coach. Churches were
simply not willing or were unable to pay reasonable consulting fees and
they found the path to securing a coach a fearful and uncertain journey.
Actually, I don't think we have a single person in Canada who survives on
their NCD consulting fees. The ones who do NCD full-time are paid by
denominations.
The other difficulty our coaches faced was
that the job of coaching a church was just far too extensive. The time and
energy needed to prepare a church for the survey, conduct the survey, help
them with analysis and guide them through a planning session was more than
coaches were able to deliver to the average church that could not pay them
much. When you combine the factors against a coach engaging his or her NCD
ministry, the time and effort involved in helping churches and finally the
minimal financial returns, I began to think of coaches as heroes. Forgive
me for this next statement; I also began to see coaching as the bottle
neck in delivering NCD to churches.
The dilemma was staggering. NCD coaches
stood between us and the churches we were trying to help. We were
completely dependant on those coaches to get the job done but we could not
hold them accountable. Their task was enormous and normally it was not
their first priority and held very little financial return.
It was time for hard questions and
unpleasant answers to turn into a new strategy.
Searching for a solution
After much soul searching and a few strategy
meetings, our thinking began to change. Everything about our ministry at
The Leadership Centre Willow Creek Canada was focused on the church as our
customer. Our main focus was not the senior pastor or the denomination or
the worship leader. It was churches we were trying to help. We were just
slightly off the mark with NCD as we had targeted the coach as our
customer. We needed to empower churches. Once we began the journey, it all
seemed so clear and even freeing.
What were the options?
Option One – coach all Canadian churches
ourselves. Wow, that's absurd. That was never going to happen. Our goal is
3,000 churches a year. We were in no position to hire and train an army of
people to coach churches. It didn't seem very biotic. It simply wasn't
feasible. What about all those coaches we had out there? Were we going to
give up on them all together?
Option Two – find ways to equip churches to
do NCD on their own, without coaching from us or from an accredited coach.
This seemed like half of the solution. If the church was our primary
ministry target (customer) then we needed to focus on empowering the
churches. However, the thought of churches doing NCD on their own appeared
to be far too daunting a task. Many churches had problems adopting the
principles of NCD and moving through the NCD cycle even with the help of a
coach. Certainly, less healthy churches would never make it. With a strong
conviction that putting more tools in the hands of church was part of the
solution, we began the task.
A new training focus
The first thing we did was change the focus
of our NCD training conferences. We had been training coaches and we
needed to train church leaders. We gathered a team of our best NCD coaches
and together we determined exactly which individuals within a church we
needed to reach and what they needed to know and do. Once we had our
targets identified and specific learning goals for those people, we hired
an educational consultant to help us strategize how to achieve those goals
with our training participants. Our training became highly interactive
small group sessions. Church leaders shared their ideas with others,
completed exercises together, wrestled with case studies and debated
questions. After the first season with our new training, we dropped our
sessions on coaching altogether. If you want to become an accredited NCD
coach in Canada today, you must attend the church training, complete a
list of preparation exercises for prospective coaches and work with your
own church first. There is more on the current role for Canadian NCD
coaches later in the article.
We were still faced with a daunting task.
How would we personally train all those church leaders? They would not
likely travel from their regions to our training conferences in the larger
cities. Most would not have sufficient funding. We needed to take the
training to churches or at least to their communities.
The first step was to develop trainers, key
people within denominations who were passionate about NCD and had the gift
of teaching. It was surprising how many of these people we were able to
find. We developed an apprenticeship program for trainers where they would
begin by helping us at a training event. Next they would be a main
facilitator at our event and finally they would host their own event where
we would help them. Once they completed this process they received
accreditation as a trainer for NCD in Canada.
As we were multiplying our trainers, we were
developing tools for them. We slowly refined our training events for
churches and developed training curriculum with participant's guides,
PowerPoint presentations, presenter's notes, training schedules, etc. We
put tools in the hands of our new trainers to help maintain a level of
training excellence that stayed true to the principles of NCD and our
desire to create rich learning environments for training participants. The
next step for us is to find ways to take these training sessions into the
churches where they can train their key influencers with the principles of
NCD. We are not quite there yet but we are so close we can almost taste
it.
As we began training trainers to work with
churches we also started developing tools for those churches. At first we
constructed a church training kit with NCD resources, PowerPoint
presentations, the Core 4 software, etc. contained within the kit. The kit
included a binder with a section for each phase of the NCD cycle. Although
the church kits were a step in the right direction churches found them
expensive and they were difficult for us to produce. There was a better
way.
Empowerment à la www.com
In early December of 2003 I paid a visit to
the Purpose Driven Life website. I was inspired. Let me underline those
words "I was inspired". What the Saddleback Church had done was
place all the resources they had available for Purpose Driven Life on a
website. Churches had full access to the resources as they conducted their
40 Day's of Purpose campaign. Everything was step by step. They had
empowered churches to do a full Purpose Drive Life campaign without the
help of a consultant. And it was working. Purpose Driven Life was sweeping
North America. I was hearing so many stories of how churches had
implemented the campaign and how their churches had changed. Most
interesting to me was that every story, yes every story, included a little
testimony about how easy Saddleback had made it with all the available
tools.
I knew we needed to do the same with NCD in
Canada. Well, it nearly ruined my Christmas of 2003. I spent the holidays
and the two following months learning website programming and writing
webpages. We designed the website (www.ncdcanada.com) to follow the NCD
Cycle and provided tools for each of the phases. Churches can download an
overview to inspire their leaders, print their survey forms on-line,
download the Core 4 software, learn how to run a focus group, form an NCD
implementation team, receive instructions on analysis, ask diagnostic
questions, etc.
A system of regular contact
We developed a system of regular contact
with churches as they move through the NCD cycle. When they download the
questionnaires from the website, we collect their e-mail address and send
them comprehensive instructions for conducting the survey with excellence.
When they send us their Core 4 mdb file for processing, we send back full
instructions for moving through analysis, for conducting focus groups and
we include a promo for the Profile Plus. (Just a note here; we process all
the mdb files ourselves in Canada. Coaches no longer have dongles. This
gives us full access to results and the ability to track amazing
statistics regarding the progress of NCD and the health of participating
churches.) About two months after sending a church their results, we ask
them to complete a survey regarding their progress with the NCD cycle. The
logical next step for us is to contact the church after one year to ensure
they are planning for their next survey. It seems like a lot of work but
it is easily accomplished with today's technology. The personal contact is
initiated by churches as they have questions, etc.
The response has been good. Churches
appreciate being empowered. They are finding people within their
congregations who make it their task to search the website for tools and
understand everything they can about NCD. I think what has happened is
that we have transferred ownership for NCD from the coach to the church.
We are growing independent churches that can take care of the NCD
ministry. Empowerment has resulted in ownership.
What about all our coaches?
It may appear that we have cut coaching out
of our strategy. Not at all, may it never be. I take heed of the research
that says a church that uses an outside consultant is likely to be
healthier. I do confess that we have not put a lot of recent energy into
developing our coaches. We were so fixated on empowering churches and
getting tools into their hands that even some of our coaches felt left out
of the picture. I remember a lengthy and difficult conversation with one
of our finest coaches who felt unempowered. She believed we had taken her
work from her. She was almost correct; but what we have actually
accomplished is that we have done a lot of her work for her. So much of
the (forgive the term) grunt work of coaching was no longer necessary
because churches were doing this work themselves. Churches are now
downloading and copying their questionnaires, conducting the survey
meetings, and entering the surveys into the Core 4 software. I believe
what we have done in Canada is that we have freed our coaches to work with
churches in the areas where they really need help. A coach now has more
time to do some upfront preparation work with a church and more time for
analysis and perhaps action planning. It is also true that all the tools
available for churches are also available for coaches. They can use our
website, our training curriculum and our communication with churches to
empower the churches they serve. Primarily, coaches who hold the value of
passing ownership for the NCD cycle to the churches will see our strategy
changes as beneficial. Coaches who want to have NCD coaching work with a
church year after year may see us as a competitor.
Where are we at today?
There is still a lot of work to do. Now that
we have placed tools in the hands of churches, we need to redevelop our
coaching system to the new reality. We are considering a brokering system
for coaching where we pass coaching work to trained coaches as churches
request help. Remember, we consider the church our customer. It is very
early in our thinking on this idea but this is how we think it could work.
|
Step 1 |
Identify very specific areas where a
coach could work with a
church. |
|
Step 2 |
Develop a pricing structure for each
coaching task. |
|
Step 3 |
Identify and train coaches for the new
system and ensure they carry the empowerment value. |
|
Step 4 |
Promote this coaching system with the
churches making contact with us. |
|
Step 5 |
Allow churches to determine the areas
where they desire coaching. |
|
Step 6 |
Develop an evaluation system where
churches evaluate the work the coaches have done with them and
report their progress to us. |
|
Step 7 |
Permit, motivate and reward these
trained coaches to train others. |
We also need to continue to press forward
with our new trainers. They need continued empowerment, encouragement, and
tools as they do NCD training with our curriculum. They need to be
encouraged to multiply and train other trainers. Our current coaches need
to be retrained to harness our new system of empowering local churches for
NCD. Yes, there is still a lot of work to do.
In conclusion I want to make it clear that I
don't believe we have arrived at NCD nirvana in Canada. (I need more
forgiveness for using a non-Christian term). The truth is that our survey
sales are plateaued. Churches seem to be doing surveys but far too few
have actually made the paradigm shift that NCD offers. Our survey repeat
rates have dramatically improved but are probably still not at a level
that will sustain a long term NCD ministry. With these difficulties facing
us, I know this with absolute conviction and clarity, empowering churches
through training, website tools, and an empowering coaching model is the
right direction for us in Canada. It is a long road but a rewarding one. I
feel very confident that as churches own NCD and persevere in their
journey they will make the paradigm shift. May God make it so.
Jeff
Berrie is the former director for Natural Church Development in Canada
(www.ncdcanada.com).
He is currently beginning a ministry which will work with denominations to
help them network their churches with the purpose of growing healthy and
planting churches together. |